Workers must remember Harper’s attacks when they go to the polls in October

by Haseena Manek, originally published by the Canadian Association of Labour Media

Harper has been Prime Minister for almost a decade. In that time, the Conservative government’s war on workers has touched nearly every sector and industry. Through a combination of policy and propaganda, the Conservatives have started to dismantle the system of protections that have been put in place by decades of advocacy by labour organizations and unions. Their right-wing agenda has generated policies that hurt the environment, social services and all workers, especially People of Colour, Indigenous communities, women, the poor and other marginalized groups.

“This government has been clear in its dislike of unions and collective bargaining,” said Angella MacEwan, Senior Economist with the Canadian Labour Congress, “There has been no respect for the important role unions play in the workplace and in civil society.”

LEGISLATIVE ATTACKS12001038_1048876415156936_1619291682176964586_o

Nine years is a long time in politics, and Harper has been extremely strategic in how his government has waged this war. The Conservatives have pushed pieces of union-busting legislation attacking labour organizations, attacking Canadian workers’ rights to unionize, and threatening access to pensions, employment insurance and healthcare.

Ground Zero for these attacks has been the House of Commons, where piece after piece of legislation has taken aim at unions and collective bargaining.

Bill C-60 Amends the Financial Administration Act (Clauses 228 and 229)

Bill C-60 is the omnibus budget bill that passed in 2013. Buried in this bill is a provision that allows for the Treasury Board to direct collective bargaining for 48 Crown corporations including the CBC, Canada Post, Via Rail as well as Canadian arts organizations like the Canada Council for the Arts and the National Arts Centre in Ottawa. This amendment requires that the Treasury board approve collective agreements and the terms and contracts for non-unionized employees. It also mandates that a government employee should observe negotiations.

“Bill 60 … essentially gives [the] Treasury Board unfettered authority to interfere in bargaining with Crown Corporations, removing effective control from the parties most directly affected,” said Chris Aylward, Public Service Alliance of Canada National Executive Vice President in a statement. “This is not a recipe for healthy labour relations.”

This will allow employees to be used as political pinballs if governments seek to impose management-friendly contracts as a way to cut costs.

crowd_pictureBill C-377: An Act to Amend the Income Tax Act

Bill C-377 was a private member’s bill that was pushed by government forces to eventually pass this past July. To pass C-377, Senators had to suspend their own rules of debate and extend their session into the summer.

C-377 requires unions to publicly account for every dime spent in a given year. This means that the financial information of unions, union federations and labour organizations – including the personal information of union members – would be publicly available. Of course, keeping track of such an enormous amount of information is going to cost millions, both for unions but also for Canada Revenue Agency.

Bill C-525, the Employee Voting Rights Act 

This private member’s bill, subtitled “An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act and the Public Service Labour Relations Act,” passed this past April and fundamentally changes the process of forming unions in the federally-regulated industries. C-525 eliminated card check certification. In order to form a union, a secret-ballot vote must be held in which the majority of the bargaining unit – not the majority of voters – must vote yes to certify a union. Any worker who does not participate in this vote is counted as a “no” ballot.

“The Bill would make changes to laws that had been painstakingly negotiated by previous governments working together with both unions and employers to achieve balanced and respected workplace regulations,” said former Canadian Labour Congress President Ken Georgetti in an editorial for the Huffington Post.

The attacks don’t stop there. Harper’s government has made Employment Insurance less accessible, implemented tax cuts that decrease funding to public services, prevented the expansion of the Canadian Pension Plan, failed to enforce the Canada Health Accord, delayed access to Old Age Security pension, changed the defined benefit pension plans for many workers in Crown corporations and started to eliminate door to door mail delivery. His government has also made “economic deals that protect corporations’ rights over workers rights or environmental concerns,” added Angella MacEwan.

“Most of what they’re doing has not been good for workers,” she continued. “If you need something from Employment Insurance or if you need something from Veterans Affairs, it becomes harder to access those services. We’ve seen this erosion of public services, and as a worker that affects you, because workers are citizens.”

Relying on Back to Work legislation became a preferred negotiation tactic under Harper’s tenure, too. Former Labour Minister and Member of Parliament for Halton Lisa Raitt justified back-to-work legislation by arguing that workers for Canada Post and Air Canada perform nearly essential services. She went so far as to suggest that the economy itself is an essential service, a concept that plainly prioritizes profit over workers’ rights and that could put labour negotiations in those industries at risk.

ATTACKING THE MOST VULNERABLE

Unionized workers are hardly the only community targeted by Harper’s attacks. Workers who work through the Temporary Foreign Worker Program have been placed at the mercy of an oppressive and exploitative migrant labour initiative.

The program leaves workers vulnerable to abuse from employers and without access to the support and benefits of labour organizations or Canadian public services.

“The government and the employer organizations will always argue and say that migrant workers have the same rights on paper as Canadian workers. This is not true,” said Chris Ramsaroop, of Justice for Migrant Workers, “because migrant workers can be deported or they can lose their temporary work status on a whim or at a moment’s notice, it denies them basic benefits.”

“Immigration laws are being used to pit working class people against one another,” continued Ramsaroop. “We should not consider migrant workers threats to our jobs. Our challenge as working people is to be against federal laws that divide us.”

HARPER’S ANTI-UNION AIR WAR

In order to obscure their poor economic track record and fuel Harper’s war on unions, the Conservatives have employed a media strategy where the message is tightly controlled and journalists are rarely able to challenge Harper in press conferences. This has allowed extreme right-wing rhetoric to become the norm, making labour organizations vulnerable.

Also, despite having prioritized the economy over the people, Conservative financial strategies have not actually managed to aid economic growth in Canada.

This past July, Unifor releasedRhetoric and Reality: Evaluating Canadas Economic Record Under the Harper Government which explains in detail the state of Canada’s economy under Harper in comparison to the record of each major government since WWII. The data of the report is organized into three categories: Work, Production and Distribution and Debt. The report says that in the post-war period, Canada’s economy has never been worse.

Harper’s government has the lowest numbers in job-creation, second lowest in employment rates and has averaged an unemployment rate of 10 per cent; the highest since William Lyon Mackenzie King’s last term as Prime Minister.

ELECTION TIME

After nine years of attacks, the labour movement will soon have the opportunity to vote Harper out of office and end the Conservative war on workers. There is hope that Canadian labour organizations will begin the new term with renewed strength and organization, ready to bring workers rights back to the table in Ottawa.

“I’d say right now we’re under attack, both federally and in some provinces and have been for the last couple of years,” said Mark Hennessy, Director of Political Action for the United Food and Commercial Workers. “I wouldn’t say we’re in our strongest position, but I think we’re becoming stronger because of these attacks. I think we’re becoming more coordinated and strategic as a labour movement and we’re finding ourselves working together quite a bit more.”

What is needed now is leadership that will work with labour to reverse the changes Harper has made to break down the labour movement, and build it back up – taller and stronger than ever. That’s why the 2015 election is such a vital moment for workers in Canada.

This election will be characterized by two important firsts: the first time that the NDP has a reasonable chance at forming government, and the first time that election third-party spending rules threaten union-lead elections campaigns.

The potential of an NDP government is enormous. But as many provincial governments have demonstrated, an NDP win isn’t an instant guarantee that workers’ rights will drastically improve. Instead, unions need to anticipate mounting pressure on government, whatever the stripe, post-October 19. And, in the lead up, union members must be engaged on-the-ground during the election.

This is where the second “first” becomes critical: among Harper’s other attacks on Canadians, includes the changes that his government has made through the “Fair Elections Act”. These changes make it harder for students and people with addresses that change frequently to prove residence when they go to the polls. On top of this, Elections Canada is no longer allowed to advertise the basic details around how to vote.

But for unions, stricter penalties and stronger definitions for third-party campaigns threaten to slow the advocacy that is needed on their behalf. With higher spending penalties, and language that seems to prohibit campaigns that target a particular party or group, many unions are shying away from campaigns to protect workers by voting out Harper.

Despite this, it is well within the rights of labour organizations to campaign openly in support of – or against – a particular candidate or party. Beyond this, it is necessary for labour organizations to identify and support a candidate that will be an ally to Canadian labour.

In 1991 the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in favour of “the idea that unions need to be able to participate in politics and culture beyond the workplace,” explained Jacob Saltiel, Human Rights and Social Justice Intern for Raven Law, based in Ottawa. Saltiel is working on a report tentatively titled “Unusual Practices, Unnecessary Acts: Federal Labour Rights in Canada Under the Conservatives, February 6, 2006”.

“There are some arguments out there that unions should be restricted to the workplace and workers, but as the Supreme Court commented in that case, they recognize that unions have to be able to speak to the wider public on issues that affect them, since otherwise it’s very difficult for them to do the things they need to do.

“I do think unions have a very important public role in that they should be allowed to support whichever party they think will work with them as partners.”

Print Friendly

Add Comment