CLC Recap: New Leader, Same Challenges

BnSkh-_IAAAeH2oReport from David Bush, CLC convention delegate and editor.

Stay tuned for’s analysis of the whole CLC convention next week.

The CLC convention, the largest in its history,  is over and the house of labour has a new president. On Thursday afternoon the delegates from the CLC convention elected Hassan Yussuff as their new President. Yussuff won by a slim majority: 2318 votes to Ken Georgetti’s 2278. There were 29 spoiled ballots.

The whole Georgetti slate lost, but only one new CLC officer was elected: Donald Lafleur from CUPW as a new executive vice president. Marie Clarke Walker retained her executive vice president position. Barb Byers was elected as the new secretary treasurer, leaving her position as an executive vice president.

The actual election was a little ugly as both sides bussed in delegates just for the vote. Two new whole rooms were opened up and over a 1500 new delegates flooded the floor. The last full day was dominated by the election, even though it was only scheduled for a half hour. After the presidential vote but before the winner was announced, delegates went on a march against austerity. The march was a nice break but there was certainly a fair amount of tension and nerves in the air.

When the vote was announced there was a split second of silence before half of the room erupted with chants of “Yussuff! Yussuff! Yussuff!” It was the first time an incumbent CLC presidential candidate was defeated. Yussuff is also the first person of colour to head the CLC. This and his immigrant roots are a big symbolic shift for the labour movement.

A Modest Shakeup
Yussuff’s acceptance speech targeted the Harper and the Conservative Party, saying the CLC needs to take the fight to them. During his closing remarks at the CLC convention Yussuff words were even stronger saying that he will “see us on the picket line, at the occupations, and possibly even at a general strike.”

This is a welcome change of rhetoric from the top. However, it is incorrect to think that this rhetorical shift will somehow create great change in the labour movement. It was an important victory to get rid of Georgetti, whose conservative tendencies have reinforced the right-wing in the labour movement. But to describe the officer elections at the CLC, which amounted to a  reshuffling of positions, as change does not reflect the facts (the exception being the election Lafleur, which was an important victory for those who want to see a national fightback strategy against the cuts at Canada Post). Unifor now has its man in the driver seat and we shall see what he can do.

The Husseini campaign opened up this space for the left at the CLC level and without his candidacy none of this modest shakeup would have happened.

The Husseini campaign opened up this space for the left at the CLC level and without his candidacy none of this modest shakeup would have happened. His tactical withdrawal put momentum into Yussuff’s campaign and surely helped sway some fence sitters in the Georgetti camp to vote against their candidate. From several sources we have learned that the bulk of dissident Georgetti voters came from NUPGE, specifically the OPSEU (Ontario) and SGEU (Saskatchewan) camps. The Husseini campaign, despite disagreement, was not majorly fractured coming out of the convention.

After Convention
But we must keep in mind that the CLC is currently not a place were effective change can be enacted. This is precisely because the CLC itself is weak. It is the big national affiliates that have the power. This means the struggle to make the labour movement a fighting force has to begin at the local level that aims to push the affiliates to adopt more militant and progressive positions on the ground.

-1This doesn’t mean the Husseini campaign and the Yussuff victory were meaningless. The Husseini campaign allowed progressive trade unionists to connect from across the country and created an opening for building a cross country network. Will this happen? It is an open question and totally dependent upon those involved in the campaign and how they confront the strategic and tactical questions before them: what should we build exactly, for what purpose, who will it involve and how should it go about doing it? The one firm idea coming out of the last caucus is that Take Back the CLC campaign will organize some sort of forum or gathering at the People’s Social Forum in Ottawa at the end of August.

As for the meaning of Yussuff’s victory, it wasn’t nothing and it wasn’t everything. Yussuff was pushed by the Husseini camp and by his own supporters to talk more about mobilization and grassroots organizing. This will make it easier to critique the Together Fairness Works campaign when it inevitably fails to deliver the goods. We have a new President of the CLC and that is good, but the work we have to do remains the same.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

6 thoughts on “CLC Recap: New Leader, Same Challenges

  1. From the very close vote it shows how big a divide there is in the labour movement. I for one am glad that he was defeated.
    “It was an important victory to get rid of Georgetti, whose conservative tendencies have reinforced the right-wing in the labour movement.” Could not agree more with this statement.

  2. While it is no doubt accurate to say that there were cracks in NUPGE which were greatly exacerbated by the way in which Georgetti & Clancy treated Barb Byers (by running someone else from NUPGE for her Exec Offficer position), that shift of votes only made a difference after all the other moving parts were in play & delivered upon. I would not be surprised if a similar dynamic didn’t play itself out in CUPE for the way in which they tried to throw Clark Walker over the cliff.

    But without the buses, it wouldn’t have mattered. One less bus here, one more bus there could have easily shifted the results. And had Husseini stayed in for the first ballot, it could have easily led to a Georgetti victory. The main credit for Yussuff’s victory goes to his election team and Husseini’s pragmatic move to withdraw & support Yussuff.

    It should also be noted that after the Presidential vote, more than 1,000 delegates left before the Sec-Treasurer vote. Even more were gone after that. Team Georgetti had no use for their slate once he was gone and it showed as the margins of victory grew.

    Another factor which turned off delegates in NUPGE, CUPE and no doubt other affiliates was the heavy-handed vote whipping and attempts to shelter the delegates from Yussuff, Byers, Clark Walker, Lafleur and Husseini by keeping them out of their caucus meetings. (Although no doubt some affiliates on the Yussuff side did the same) This provided an opening for the Husseini team to move & win an historic all candidates meeting on the convention floor. The vote on that motion in the NUPGE caucus was overwhelmingly in favour of a debate. And the CLC’s own decision to set up secret voting booths enabled delegates to vote their conscience without fear of people looking over their shoulders to exact retribution later.

    In my view, one of the main lessons for Yussuff was that there would be heavy price to pay for taking “the left” for granted. The respectful dialogue and discussions between the two camps that led to Husseini’s electrifying move can show as a model for the future.

    Perhaps it can be said that Yussuff is our Obama – in both the positive side – “hope” but more importantly on the need for progressives to hold Yussuff accountable for providing strong leadership. Of course this is in the context of the CLC structure which does not easily lend itself to “taking back the CLC” for the members. We never really had it did we?

    As a delegate, I have to say it was on of the most thrilling labour conventions I’ve attended. It was an honour to be associated with the Yussuff team and to get to know Husseini.

  3. HY is not “new”. He is part of the same bureaucratic CLC as KG and the rest. They, as stated above, will fail in their pathetic “Together Fairness Works” nonsense. Organized labour in Canada is by and large led by class collaborators who are fighting over the perks of office.

  4. Ted, let’s give HY a chance before you want to scuttle him. This is a good progressive change, it is up to you, as to how the CLC functions. Remember, the grassroots have the power if they know how to use it. Let’s get working people and hold the “NEW” Executive’s feet to the fire.
    In Solidarity
    Bob Peacock

  5. All of this talk is interesting for navel-gazing convention junkies. More preaching to the converted. But at the end of the day, how aware is your average rank and file union member of the issues facing the movement- and our country- today? Not enough, I think we’d all agree. That is the purpose of the ‘together fairness works’ campaign. Reach out and re-engage our members. We must do that if we are going to be effective in fighting back against the neo-cons.
    In solidarity,

Add Comment